Will ASEAN Membership Be Turning Point for Timor-Leste’s Economy?

|

Suryo Bimantro, COGGS Intern

AFTER MORE THAN a decade as an observer and applicant, metal rich Timor-Leste is set to officially join the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this year, with its membership scheduled to be formally ratified at the 47th ASEAN Summit in October 2025. Timor-Leste’s entrance into the Southeast Asian organization represents its decade-long struggle and progress as a “juvenile nation” that achieved national sovereignty and independence in the 2000s. Accepting Timor-Leste would also signify ASEAN’s emphasis on regional inclusivity and integration among nations within the region, despite significant economic and institutional disparities. This move would prioritize the development of Southeast Asian regionalism and unification above all else.

Such integration could potentially help improve Timor-Leste’s struggling economy. According to a 2025 report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Timor-Leste is ranked as one of the poorest nations in the Southeast Asian region, with a total GDP of approximately $2.1 billion USD and a GDP per capita of only $1,490 USD. ASEAN membership could also bring viable solutions to the critical issues the country is currently facing.

(46th ASEAN Summit. Courtesy: The Star)

This article’s main purpose is to explain how Timor-Leste’s integration into ASEAN could offer opportunities for multilateral cooperation that would assist in national development and help address the challenges the nation continues to face. After all, multipolarity within ASEAN cannot be achieved if member countries focus solely on self-serving development.

ASEAN perceives its goal for economic cooperation as a priority for all its members without exclusion. This would provide Timor-Leste with the grand opportunity to learn from ASEAN states with longer experiences in maintaining and developing their economies. ASEAN has the capability to provide intensive training sessions for Timor-Leste’s government officials—sessions that provide expert insights and knowledge-sharing discussions within important subjects such as international trade, finance, tax management, resource management, and various other subjects that could help the Timor-Leste government to prepare its entry into the ASEAN economic framework, the next stage for its potential development within the Southeast Asian region itself.

Currently, this intensive training program has been done this year, specifically during the 11th–13th of March, 2025, in Timor-Leste’s capital city, Dili. This program involved several key actors, which include the Deputy Secretary-Director of the ASEAN Economic Community, the Asian Development Bank Country Director, the Malaysian Ambassador of Timor-Leste, the ASEAN Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Timor-Leste, and the rest are the ASEAN Secretariat staff, who are positioned as the trainers within the program. Every actor mentioned has the sole mission of preparing the economic and institutional readiness of Timor-Leste’s existing ministries and agencies as they finally integrate the nation into becoming a part of the ASEAN economic domain. If ASEAN’s intensive training program succeeds, it could bolster several solutions for some of Timor-Leste’s ongoing internal issues.

east timor, peace, hand, nation, background, banner, wallpaper 4k, colors, country, full hd wallpaper, cool backgrounds, ensign, flag, windows wallpaper, free wallpaper, desktop backgrounds, graphic, free background, 4k wallpaper 1920x1080, 4k wallpaper, wallpaper hd, hd wallpaper, icon, national, mac wallpaper, state, symbol, tourism, laptop wallpaper, beautiful wallpaper, travel

Beyond Oil & Gas

According to the Ministry of Trade and Industry of Timor-Leste, the country is suffering from an overreliance on gas and oil exports. Specifically, around 90% of Timor-Leste’s exports consist of gas and oil, with little room for other industries to participate in international trade. An overreliance on oil and gas may demonstrate a country’s wealth in natural resources, but it also reveals vulnerability and a lack of progress within a country’s economy. Fundamentally, globalization has made the world economically interconnected. If the prices of both oil and gas were to decrease significantly in the future due to the global transition toward clean and renewable energy, then Timor-Leste’s export revenues could suffer a downturn, causing a halt in its economic development.

This applies similarly if the prices of oil and gas were to increase, in the form of the infamous Dutch Disease—an economic phenomenon where an overreliance on a specific sector drives up a country’s currency value. This could alleviate the country’s poverty rate and stimulate internal development in the short term. However, in the long term, there’s a risk that it would allow cheap foreign imports to overtake the country’s industries, preventing the private sector from growing or competing fairly, while foreign businesses become powerful stakeholders and slowly monopolize the economy from within. The people of Timor-Leste would not only suffer significantly from higher poverty rates, but they would also face rising inflation, a lack of innovation and sustainable development, and a cycle of exploitation that is indirect in nature.

With ASEAN’s capacity-building program and intensive training sessions, member states could take advisory roles in managing Timor-Leste’s overreliance on oil and gas by helping the country discover new natural resources, develop industrial skills, implement human resource capacity-building methods, and pursue various other initiatives to strengthen Timor-Leste’s market diversification and improve its dwindling private sector.

To further increase the chances of success for these diversified markets, ASEAN member states could open trade barriers between Timor-Leste and themselves—or even call upon nations within the Asia-Pacific region, such as Japan and South Korea, to begin investing in Timor-Leste’s diversified markets while engaging in more bilateral or multilateral trade activities. What’s the point of diversifying an economy if you can’t even diversify your consumers?

Obviously, oil and gas industrial dependency won’t just disappear in the short term; this is why ASEAN economic cooperation must prove itself to be stable, efficient, and continuous in providing strong results with Timor-Leste’s ministries and agencies.

Tapping into Minerals

As mentioned previously, an overreliance on two natural resources wouldn’t aid Timor-Leste’s survivability in the long term before it eventually turns into a fallen state. This is why more markets, especially within the private sector, need to be formed to expand Timor-Leste’s international trade and human resource capacity—markets that will be formed from the rich and plentiful mineral resources within the lands of Timor-Leste itself.

According to a 2003 study by Francisco da Costa Monteiro, Director of Energy and Minerals within Timor-Leste, Timor-Leste’s natural resources are abundant, encompassing not only the vast oil and gas reserves within the land but also a variety of rich minerals discovered within Timor-Leste’s coastal environments. These minerals are divided into two categories—metallic and non-metallic—to simplify understanding.

 

Metallic Minerals Gold, copper, manganese, silver, and chromite.
Non-Metallic Minerals Sand, gravel, limestone, clay, bentonites, kaolinites, marble, gypsum, and phosphate.

The fact that Timor-Leste’s rich minerals are scattered throughout the country yet it could barely develop its economy proves the vast, untapped potential it currently has. Firstly, its metallic minerals could provide market ideas that could diversify the economy and expand trade flows with other countries.

 

christmas, decoration, angel hair, ornament, decor, gold, mobile wallpaper, phone wallpaper, iphone background, macro, closeup, gold, gold, mobile wallpaper, mobile wallpaper, mobile wallpaper, phone wallpaper, phone wallpaper, phone wallpaper, phone wallpaper, phone wallpaper

 

Gold Copper Manganese Silver Chromite
Gold could serve both as an export-oriented market and a domestic manufacturing market. A lot of developed countries see the value of gold in many luxury brands and jewelry industries.

 

ASEAN must remember to advise Timor-Leste’s development regarding their human resource capacity in manufacturing to ensure gold will not just solely be used for foreign extraction, but can also be used as a new job market for gold manufacturing domestically.

 According to the International Copper Study Group (ICSG), copper mining would reach an approximate number of 23.5 million tonnes within 2025, a 2.3% increase from 2024. This significant rise proves that copper mining could be a great asset for Timor-Leste’s developing economy. It would attract foreign investments, trade, and cooperation from both ASEAN and the entire global domain potentially.

 

Copper are used for manufacturing vehicles such as motorcycles and cars while also being a foundational material for phones and computers, objects that are central to the modern Southeast Asian contemporary culture nowadays.

 

Despite the harsh labor, this could prove to be a great economic diversification mechanism for Timor-Leste, though its sustainability over the future is questionable due to the rise of clean and renewable energy alternatives. That’s where the ASEAN economic cooperation comes in and discusses the issue with Timor-Leste.

 Another form of useful mineral that Timor-Leste’s officials could unearth to diversify it’s economy would be the manganese mineral, a mineral that could strengthen metallic materials such as steel, a very important mechanism to have within foreign aviation, shipment, and even military industries if properly maintained. Just like these other materials, silver holds a wide range of usage in terms of manufacturing itself. Silver is used to manufacture phones, computers, laptops, televisions, circuit boards, batteries, and so much more. It’s possible to improve upon a country’s trade and innovation, which is truly remarkable. Just like other materials here, chromite also serves as a hardening material for aerospace, aviation, transport, and other manufacturing industries.

Through these discoveries alone, Timor-Leste proves itself to be a hotspot for many manufacturing-based industries. Through ASEAN economic cooperation, ASEAN could assist in Timor-Leste’s maintenance of these valuable minerals, creating jobs in the mining sector, logistics, manufacturing, sales and marketing, shipment and trade, and even finance. This could raise a new wave of skilled workers who could improve their livelihoods every time minerals are extracted or manufactured—a true capacity-building program born from the country’s rich natural resources.

ASEAN must provide sufficient advisory not only on proper management but also by connecting Timor-Leste with potential trade partners within and outside the region to ensure that trade flows and revenues increase rather than remain stagnant. Besides trade partners, advisory efforts should also focus on talent building through education and training programs for the youth of Timor-Leste in order to prepare for the introduction of new technology and manufacturing-based businesses across the country.

The Case of Corruption

The last and most crucial problem that ASEAN could assist Timor-Leste with would be the cycle of corruption, which could potentially destabilize all these capacity-building efforts. According to the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) in 2024, Timor-Leste ranks 70th out of a total of 180 countries around the world in terms of corruption, proving it to be less corrupt in comparison to other countries—though this result might be due to the country’s small population.

Through ASEAN economic integration, Timor-Leste could potentially lower that ranking even further through ASEAN’s collaborative platform, ASEAN-PAC (Parties Against Corruption), which was previously labeled as SEA-PAC (Southeast Asian Parties Against Corruption) in 2004.

The collaborative platform serves as a regional cooperation mechanism that provides extensive knowledge-sharing on anti-corruption methods and strategies; training programs to develop skill sets to counter corruption schemes; exchanges of expertise between countries through certified and experienced personnel and officials to help implement anti-corruption strategies within Southeast Asia; and conferences to gather ideas and strategies among ASEAN member states to further anti-corruption development across the region.

If Timor-Leste does not view its integration into ASEAN-PAC as a possibility, then all potential revenue growth from mineral resources, international trade, and many of its diversified markets could be at risk from the grasp of internal corruption—especially given that the country upholds democracy as its primary form of governance.

The bigger the economy, the merrier the people. The merrier the people, the more confident they are in raising children. The more confident the people become in having children, the more the population increases. As the population increases, centralized supervision becomes harder to manage within a full-blown democracy. Immense population growth begins to exert more and more plurality of morals and ethics as society grows, creating more hidden blind spots for those intelligent enough to exploit vast revenues for themselves among thousands or even millions of others around them.

[ Suryo Bimantro is an intern at COGGS and based in Surabaya, Indonesia. Opinions expressed those are his own. ]

References:  

  1. https://asean.org/asean-secretariat-supports-timor-lestes-asean-integration-with-phase-2-of-capacity-building-programme/.

 

  1. Top Export-Import Countries. 2023. “Top Export-Import Countries.” Trade Information Portal. 2023. https://timor-lestetradeportal.com/id-id/site/display/808.

 

  1. ‌Da Costa Monteiro, Francisco, Vicenti Da, and Costa Pinto. 2003. “Exploring Timor-Leste: -Minerals Potential.” https://www.pecc.org/resources/minerals-a-energy/1264-exploring-timor-leste-minerals-potential-paper/file
  2. Chen, Jackson. 2025. “Global Copper Surplus to More than Double in 2025 – ICSG.” MINING.COM. April 30, 2025. https://www.mining.com/?p=1177704.

 

‌Woolwine, C.S. 2019. Cyclic. https://cms.kpk.go.id/storage/tinymce/uploads/pdf/1733102405_E-Booklet-ASEAN_PAC.pdf

 

Will ASEAN Membership Be Turning Point for Timor-Leste’s Economy? Read Post »

Vietnam’s Challenges to be Critical Mineral Powerhouse

|

Iftah Al Aqliyah

AS THE WORLD moves towards a green energy future, demand for critical minerals such as nickel, silicon, lithium, copper, and other rare earth elements (REE) is increasing because these are the key components in the production of products like electric vehicles (EVs), wind turbines, and solar panels. Located in Southeast Asia, Vietnam, is a major market for China, the US, Japan, South Korea, and the European Union. Beyond being a key market, the aspiring economic power also serves as a strategic partner in the region’s energy transition. The critical minerals project supports the development of green energy technology industries, boost environmental standards and place the nation in the map of global clean energy transition. This is evidenced by Vietnam’s commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 at the COP26 Summit in Glasgow and the receipt of funding through the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) program amounting to US$15.5 billion, while also launching the Power Development Plan VIII (PDP8). However, Vietnam faces significant challenges in meeting domestic demand for critical minerals and ensuring sustainable management.

 

 

Increase in Critical Minerals in Vietnam

Vietnam’s participation in commitments under the Action program for Transition to Green Energy and Mitigation of Carbon Dioxide and Methane Emissions from Transport is driving major development in renewable energy in 2021-2050. On a regional scale, projections from APEC Outlook show that the expansion of clean energy generation and electric vehicles (EV) will increase demand for critical minerals such as nickel, copper, cobalt, lithium, silicon and rare earth elements (REE) in the Asia Pacific region, including Vietnam. Demand for critical minerals on a regional scale is expected to increase in 2031-2040 compared to 2020 by 4.7 times (Huy, 2023). According to Phung Quoc Huy et al. (2024) total critical minerals demand is expected to reach 415 kilotons (kt) from 2021 to 2030 and increase to 2,133 kt from 2031 to 2050, or 15 times the 2021 level. Silicon and copper are the minerals most in demand due to the expansion of solar energy and the construction of power grids. It is estimated that copper accounts for 60% of total mineral demand, particularly for transmission systems, wind turbines, and electric vehicles (Huy et al., 2024). In addition, the need for nickel, cobalt and lithium for electric vehicle batteries will increase, especially as the local automotive industry such as VinFast grows. Although Vietnam has the second largest REE potential in the world, its use is still not maximized in terms of value-added exploration, production, processing and export.

 

Challenges in Critical Minerals Management

Vietnam’s domestic processing capacity : The nation’s domestic processing capacity is still low despite having many mineral reserves. Production of nickel, cobalt and copper has not met the surging demand. According to statistics, Vietnam produced only 16,881 tons of copper in 2021, despite demand for copper reaching more than 260,000 tons during the 2021-2030 period (Huy et al., 2024). On the contrary, cobalt production in the country is still below 200 tons per year.

 

Infrastructure and Technology Limitations: Vietnam has not successfully mastered the refining technology of minerals such as REEs that require complex and expensive chemical processes. Most mining facilities in Vietnam focus on extraction, not downstream. This hinders Vietnam from developing domestic value and acting as a value-added global supplier (Hiep, 2023)

 

Weak Regulation in Vietnam:  The regulatory framework in Vietnam is still not strong and inconsistent in its implementation which hinders the overall development of the minerals sector. The complexity of licensing procedures, poor inter-agency coordination, and corrupt practices at the local and national levels exacerbate the investment and environmental monitoring situation. These conditions create hesitation for local and foreign investors (Dung et al., 2021).

 

Political Pressure and Dependence: Vietnam’s REE potential has attracted the attention of major countries such as the United States, China and Japan. For example, Vietnam signed an MoU with the US on a partnership for REE exploration and development (Nguyen et al., 2019). This  joint venture certainly offers benefits and investment opportunities, but there is a risk of external dependency and possible exploitation of natural resources without fair and sustainable technology transfer.

copper oil lamp, macro, decoration, vintage, tradition
A copper-made lamp.

 

Vietnam’s ability to manage critical minerals is crucial to the continued transition to renewable energy. Rising interest in lithium, cobalt, copper and REEs is a result of reducing carbon emissions. However, limited production, infrastructure and technology, and weak regulations are barriers to achieving certain targets. Therefore, Vietnam needs to make necessary refomrs by strengthening policies and building sustainable international cooperation.

 

(Iftah Al Aqliyah is an intern at COGGS and student at  Department of International Relations,  UPN “Veteran” Jawa timur University, Surabaya, Indonesia)

References

Dung, N. T. K. D., Luan, P. V., Chinch, V. T., & Duoe, T. V. (2021, November 10). An Overview of Rare Earth Ores Beneficiation in Vietnam. 10.29227/IM-2021-02-20

Guthrie, C. (2023, October 23). Rare earth arrests rock Vietnam’s critical minerals plans. Mining Magazine.

Hiep, L. H. (2023, November 8). Vietnam’s Rare Earth Ambitions: Economic and Strategic Drivers. FULCRUM. Retrieved Juli Jumat, 2025, from https://fulcrum.sg/vietnams-rare-earth-ambitions-economic-and-strategic-drivers/

Huy, P. Q. (2023). Estimation of Required Critical Minerals for Clean Energy Technology in the APEC Region and Risks of Supply Chain Disruption. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378302856_Estimation_of_Required_Critical_Minerals_for_Clean_Energy_Technology_in_the_APEC_Region_and_Risks_of_Supply_Chain_Disruption

Huy, P. Q., Sweetnam, G. E., & Hien, T. T. (2024). Shifting Toward Clean Energy Technology: Assessing Vietnam Critical Minerals Demand and Domestic Resources. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 10.1088/1755-1315/1395/1/012001

Nguyen, N. B., Boruff, B., & Tonts, M. (2019, June 27). The Regulatory Framework and Minerals Development in Vietnam: An Assessment of Challenges and Reform. MDPI, 11. 10.3390/su11184861

Nguyen, U. (2023, April 13). Vietnam’s Rare Earth Mining Industry: An Overview. Vietnam Briefing. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/rare-earth-mining-vietnam.html

 

Vietnam’s Challenges to be Critical Mineral Powerhouse Read Post »

Singapore’s Dual Identity: Heart of Global South, and Soul of North?

|

Alvino Adian Denata

SINGAPORE, A SMALL nation in Southeast Asia that achieved independence in 1965, has become one of ASEAN’s most prominent economic powerhouses. With a high average income, quality of life and a good bureaucracy, Singapore has a good reputation in the global arena, compared to neighbouring countries, one of the proofs is that Singapore’s passport is the strongest passport in the world. The rapid development in the fields of technology, health, education and fast infrastructure makes the condition of Singapore become stable and become a country in the spotlight of the world. This article will briefly discuss Singapore’s journey from a small colonial trading post to a global financial centre, and will also analyse how it has evolved to challenge traditional classifications of the country and highlight the complexities of its dual identity.

Historical Context : From Colony to Economic Power House

In 1819, Stamford Rafles of the British colony, first landed in the area today known as Singapore to establish a post point for strategic trade needs, especially for British colonies in the Southeast Asian region. Until 1824, the territory officially fell to the British from the Sultanate of Johor. Within just few years, Singapore, along with Penang and Malacca, formed the Straits Settlements under the British which later became a Crown Colony. Over the years Singapore developed as a port and a point of attraction for traders from various parts of the world, until the end of World War II where the Japanese power managed to weaken British power, which was used by Singapore to achieve self-government under the British Commonwealth.  Singapore joined the Malaysian federation on 16 September 1963, which lasted for two years.  Then decided to become independent on 9 August 1965.

Under the leadership of Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore significantly transformed into a highly developed country, starting with implementing rapid industrialisation and building industrial zones to attract foreign investment, as well as focusing on human resource development. Singapore also focused on opening up to multinational companies by providing infrastructure, legal and tax guarantees that became a major attraction. By investing heavily in education, they are able to produce a skilled and productive workforce. Singapore has made its way into the world’s spotlight after experiencing an average GDP increase of 7% since independence and achieving a 9.2% increase per year in the first 25 years. Continuing to focus on education, infrastructure and technology, Singapore is fast becoming a first world country in the third world region in less than half a century.

Identity Classifications: Global South or  Global North?

However despite Singapore’s rapid economic development, the country is still classified under the Global South classification, due to its geographical and cultural ties. So, what really is the difference between the Global South and the Global North?

The global south is defined as a region occupied by developing or even underdeveloped countries. It is generally located in the southern hemisphere, and is often associated with a history of colonialism. In some scholars’ views, the global South is regarded as a region that serves as a means of exploitation for the North in the world order of global capitalism. On the other hand, the North is defined as a group of developed countries that have large economic, political, economic and dominance powers. The North is considered as the controller of the world, as a form of dependence, seen in the utilisation of the South’s raw natural resources that provide many benefits to the North, while the return is the destruction of the earth’s environment.

The division of these two economic groups is not entirely correct, because many criteria overlap and sometimes do not match the grouping labels they get compared to the facts on the ground, such as Singapore. As a reminder, this grouping is not only oriented towards regions, but rather economic inequality and strength in the global arena. From the facts and notions constructed, this classification creates a metaphorical narrative, which cannot be fully interpreted. In the current era, many developing countries have finally erased the boundaries of the North and South in the contemporary era, which means that identities and classifications are no longer appropriate. So is this classification actually based on the division of the world, economically, or is it just a paradox for the sake of global domination of the big countries in the north, which massively control the major world bodies.

buildings, skyline, city lights, night sky, cityscape, skyscrapers, tall buildings, urban, urban landscape, metro, city, at night, lights, big city, asia, architecture, singapore, night photography, city, city, city, city, city, big city, singapore, singapore, singapore, singapore

 

The Paradox of the North and the South: Singapore’s Perspective

Despite having a strong history and culture with the global South, Singapore is well qualified to enter this world-dominated region from an economic and institutional perspective. With a GDP per capita of USD 82,000 (2023), Singapore can even rival the GDP figures of the United States and Switzerland. With rapid alignment in technology, standard of living and quality, Singapore is getting closer to the North in this regard. Singapore is also an economic centre with institutions such as MAS, which can compete with similar institutions in the US. Singapore is home to over 1,000 multinational companies, with a stable legal, political and economic climate. With a human development index score (reaching 0.939 in 2022), Singapore has been able to improve the level of health services, education and reduce crime, which is almost equivalent to the welfare of Nordic countries.

In terms of more general international relations theory, namely dependency theory, the South tends to be highly dependent and trapped in a long cycle with the North, while Singapore is the centre of all sectors that the South depends on the North. From the explanation above, clearly, the substance and function of Singapore is a North World country. This grouping is really just a homogenising label that forgets other factors.

Singapore has a unique situation that doesn’t fit neatly into usual categories. It isn’t clearly part of the Global South, which usually includes countries that are less developed or have trouble getting resources, nor is it like the typical Global North countries because of its location and culture. This mix of things creates a confusing situation. Even though Singapore is very wealthy, similar to many Northern countries, its income inequality is closer to that of poorer nations. This is shown by its Gini coefficient, which is around 0. 38 after taxes and transfers.

Singapore relies heavily on labour from South Asia, which is often paid low salaries and works in sectors such as construction and domestic care. The government conducts elections, but the People’s Action Party (PAP) has been in the lead for many years. The system is often criticised for not providing much freedom, which is in contrast to South Korea’s liberal system. However, the system helps maintain the country’s stability, which is considered important in the South. Singaporeans enjoy a lifestyle influenced by global trends such as Western media and products, but remain connected to Asian traditions. It shows that with strong leadership, investment in human capital, and openness to international trade, a small country lacking natural resources can be successful. But it also raises questions about equity, resilience, and preserving cultural identity in an increasingly globalised world. Singapore’s success is a good example for developing countries, showing that rapid modernisation can be achieved with tight management and a practical economic plan. However, its small size, lack of natural resources, and unique history make it difficult for other countries to replicate its model. In addition, the use of strict government control has fuelled discussions about the balance between freedom and development. Singapore shows that economic growth can happen alongside cultural and geographical differences, challenging the usual idea that only Northern countries set the standard for what it means to be developed.

Conclusion

Singapore is a clear example of how the global classification between the ‘Global South’ and the ‘Global North’ no longer fits today’s reality. On the one hand, geographically and historically, Singapore is at the centre of the global South-rooted in a context of colonialism, territorial dependency and limited natural resources. But on the other hand, the country has evolved into an entity that operates with the ‘soul’ of the global North-high standards in terms of technology, education, economic stability, and institutional structures.

This contradiction becomes clearer when we realise that even though Singapore has the same or even better development indicators as the North, it still falls under the South. This suggests that this classification is more of a geopolitical construct than an accurate reflection of a country’s condition. Moreover, Singapore demonstrates the irony of modernity: a highly developed country that still faces high income inequality; an economically efficient and competitive country, but with tight political control; a country that is considered a model of development, but is difficult for other developing countries to emulate because of its uniqueness.

Singapore is not only an exception, but also a challenge to the dominant narrative of development. As such, Singapore stands as a paradox of global identity: it is a ‘Global South country that has become a globalised nation. So why is the country with the world’s strongest passport still being debated?

 

[ Alvino Adian Denata is an intern at COGGS and student at Department of International Relations, UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia. The opinions expressed are the author’s own. ]

References

Chase-Dunn, C. &. (1995). Discusses global economic structures, core-periphery model relevant to Global North-South. World-Systems Analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 387-417.

Elkan, R. v. (1995). Singapore’s Development Strategy. In M. K. Bercuson, Singapore A Case Study in Rapid Development (p. 75). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

SG101. (2025, July 16). 1959-1965: Early Economic Strategies. Retrieved from https://www.sg101.gov.sg/: https://www.sg101.gov.sg/economy/surviving-our-independence/1959-1965/

Zhou, P. (2025, May 8). The History of Singapore’s Economic Development. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/: https://www.thoughtco.com/singapores-economic-development-1434565

 

Singapore’s Dual Identity: Heart of Global South, and Soul of North? Read Post »

Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park: Largest Nickel Factory’s Economic Gain, Ecological Loss

|

Andhini Octa Maharatih

 

AS INDONESIA ASPIRES to achieve its dream, the archipelagic nation of Southeast Asia requires  heavy investment to support its economic growth. With natural resources such as nickel, coal, gold, and minerals, more than 38 foreign mining companies, both public and private, have invested in Indonesia due to the low cost of raw materials, relatively low wages, and strategic location rich in natural resources. This has undoubtedly contributed to Indonesia’s economic growth and development. In 2024, the Ministry of Investment and Downstream Industry recorded investment growth of 15.24% and downstreaming of 21.6%, making it the largest contributor to economic growth in Indonesia. China is one among of the five major countries eager to invest in Indonesia.

Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park

PT Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park (IMIP), built by Shanghai Decent Investment Ltd under the Tsingshan Group and engaged in the nickel industry to be used as materials such as stainless steel, UV batteries and carbon steel, specifically in Morowali, Central Sulawesi. Established since 2014, IMIP has created extensive employment opportunities for the people of Sulawesi, almost 93% of whose workers are from Indonesia and has become one of the largest nickel companies in Indonesia with a percentage of 50%. In addition, compliance in paying royalties and taxes makes this company increasingly provide long-term benefits to the country’s foreign exchange that continues to flow. PT IMIP also certainly has a significant impact on economic growth recorded 71% and ranks 10th as a company that influences economic growth achieved by national strategic projects.

Workers Safety inside World’s Largest Nickel Factory

However, despite significant economic growth, a number of workplace accidents remain, despite compliance with occupational safety and health regulations. In 2023, a workplace accident occurred when a furnace exploded, sparking a fire. This fire resulted in numerous fatalities, with more than 13 workers killed and others suffering serious and minor burns. A similar incident occurred in 2022, when a nickel shelter exploded at the company’s unit. This accident left numerous workers injured, forcing them to silence their voices for the sake of the company’s reputation. The explosion generated a cloud of smoke that was inhaled by residents due to the company’s proximity to residential areas.

Not only in 2023, but in 2025, work accidents also occurred in the IMIP area, which is prone to landslides caused by heavy rainfall and vulnerable points that can cause flooding. Reports from the Ministry of Environment revealed that there are practices that can endanger the surrounding community and the environment. There is a practice of open dumping, which drains floodwater into the sea without intensive waste treatment, causing some residential areas to be inundated. Disposal of nickel slag and tailings in several vulnerable areas is also not being addressed by the government, which of course can result in heavy metal pollution that is detrimental to marine life and soil fertility.

In addition to the discovery of open dumping practices, a work accident resulted in the deaths of three workers due to a landslide that occurred in the tailings pond disposal area due to heavy rain. The community is naturally concerned about this because, in addition to being close to residential areas, tailings are hazardous waste, which, if not intensively managed, could expose residential areas to toxic waste. The public believes the frequent accidents are a result of poor safety measures. Some are demanding an evaluation and improvement of the safety of the tailings waste facility to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Indonesian mining performance data shows that PT IMIP’s working conditions rank eighth with score 29 among nickel companies in Indonesia, with a low level of occupational safety monitoring for its workers. These recurring incidents have prompted media outlets to investigate the frequent accidents. However, the media are not permitted to delve deeper into the company’s safety procedures. In response to public disappointment, PT IMIP frequently engages in social and environmental sustainability initiatives to maintain public acceptance. These initiatives include the provision of cleaning facilities, garbage trucks, mangrove planting in coastal areas, community involvement in waste management, and more. This has led to speculation that the company is deliberately greenwashing itself to maintain a positive public image despite the high number of workplace accidents and the potential for waste to disrupt the natural ecosystem.

Therefore, the state needs to oversee the ongoing down streaming process. Full government oversight and firmness are required to provide special treatment for problematic companies. ESG issues are currently being touted internationally, in connection with the 2030 SDGs. This is not only about preserving the environment but also about creating a safe space for indigenous communities to enjoy the natural resources inherited from their ancestors. Developing countries are often faced with the trade-off between investor-friendly approaches and the sacrifice of the environment and long-standing indigenous communities due to their ambitions to generate economic growth on the international stage. However, the state also needs to be firm in taking action against foreign companies that violate regulations by thoroughly investigating the issues, building adequate facilities, and ensuring public freedom of expression.

[ Andhini Octa Maharatih is a COGGS intern and student at Department of International Relations,  UPN Jawa Timur Veteran University. ] 

References: 

https://kemenlh.go.id/news/detail/negara-tidak-boleh-lengah-menteri-lh-sidak- kawasanindustri-nikel-di-morowali-temukan-pelanggaran-lingkungan-serius https://www.bkpm.go.id/id/info/siaran-pers/rosan-realisasi-investasi-terus- bertumbuhindonesia-konsisten-jalankan-hilirisasi https://responsibleminingindonesia.id/id https://jdih.esdm.go.id/common/dokumenexternal/UU%2032%20Tahun%202009%20(P PLH).pdf https://mongabay.co.id/2025/06/25/klh-temukan-pelanggaran-lingkungan- serius-di-imip/ https://imip.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/IMIP-ESG-Report- 2023.pdf

Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park: Largest Nickel Factory’s Economic Gain, Ecological Loss Read Post »

Cryptocurrency in Global South Trade: The Iran Case Study Analysis | COGGS Intern | Read Now|

|

Vericko Dhuha Zahir Negara, COGGS Intern

[Abstract : This research looks at how cryptocurrency’s role is becoming more important as an alternative in international trade, especially for countries that are not well-supported by the usual global financial system. As the SWIFT network is being used more often as a tool for political reasons to apply sanctions and control economies, many countries particularly in the Global South are looking for alternative solutions. Cryptocurrency, which is based on blockchain technology, allows people to send money directly to each other without needing banks. This reduces reliance on traditional financial institutions, cuts down on costs, and makes it easier to send money across borders quickly. Using the World-Systems Theory and the concept of Decentralized Finance, this study shows how blockchain-based currencies give countries like Iran more control and stability by helping them avoid sanctions and manage their economy better. The research used a qualitative-descriptive approach, looking at information from academic papers, news articles, and reports from organizations to spot trends. The results show that cryptocurrency’s role helps trade happen in ways that traditional systems don’t allow, and it changes how global economics works by being a clear, fast, and politically neutral option compared to conventional systems. ]

 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE IS an important aspect for a nation to increase its economic growth. One of the biggest elements of international trade is the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication also known as SWIFT, which has been the backbone of banks from various nations. However, SWIFT is not a neutral system; it has been used as an international political tool in the form of sanctions and other economic limitations (Cipriani et al., 2023). SWIFT works as a safe communication provider between banks, because of that almost any transnational currency operates under SWIFT. As a result, anytime when a nation or company has limited actions by SWIFT it can result in an economic crisis or a bankruptcy. This phenomenon of economic limitations has increased over time due to SWIFT not being a neutral system. SWIFT has increasingly become a political control tool to give sanction and limit any country’s economic activities if that country is considered a threat. This results in cost issues and regulatory restrictions that blocks developing countries from reaching not only western market but also the global market to gain a higher profit. For example, most Global South nations are submitted to this system which creates unequal dependency and makes them

vulnerable to sanction and other political-economic pressure. For that reason, many nations and companies tried to find a way to do international trade without relying on SWIFT’s system. This led them to blockchain technology, which uses cryptocurrency that was invented by an unknown individual called Satoshi Nakamoto back in 2009. Blockchain eliminates the needs of banks correspondent, documents, and time needed. Cryptocurrency offers real-time transaction or remittance, low cost, and direct access from buyer to seller without relying on banks.

 

 

Theoretical Framework

This research was conducted using the World-System theory as a way of understanding the world as a hierarchically structured capitalist system, with a dominant core and an exploited periphery (Wallerstein, 2004). According to Wallerstein, the capitalist world system began around the 16th century in Europe, through colonial expansion, international trade, and the formation of modern nation-states. Since then, this system has continued to develop into a global system with one hegemony that switches over time. World-systems theory supports an interdisciplinary approach by integrating historical, political, economic, and cultural analysis within a measured framework. On top of that, this research will also apply the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) concept. DeFi is a new model in the finance world that utilizes blockchain technology and smart contracts to provide financial services without intermediaries like banks (Zetzsche et al., 2020). This technology allows users to access financial services by peer-to-peer with just the internet and digital wallet. DeFi allows users to avoid traditional or conventional ways of international transaction or remittance which is more costly and time-consuming. As a whole, DeFi is a model that changes how transnational finance activities work.

Methods

Every data was collected through in-depth literature studies, news articles, academic publications, and any documents related to blockchain, cryptocurrency, and SWIFT. On top of that, data analysis was carried out by identifying patterns, themes, and narratives that emerged from the collected data, which were then interpreted. This approach allows the author to describe things in detail while keeping it concise. In addition, the qualitative-descriptive method enables the author to remain adaptable to the different matters of the subject regarding international trade. This method aims to provide understanding of the dynamics of the phenomenon being studied.

bitcoin, cryptocurrency, blockchain, money, digital, crypto currency, block chain, black money, black digital, bitcoin, bitcoin, bitcoin, bitcoin, bitcoin, cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency, blockchain, blockchain, crypto currency, block chain

The  Case of Iran 

Global South countries’ challenges are often stacked on top of another with systemic issues, international actors interfering, lack of facilities or technology, and internal economic issues. This creates a demand for trusted and self-custodial currency which led to digital coin using Blockchain technology (Böhmecke-Schwafert & Moreno, 2023). Cryptocurrency and blockchain offer faster, cheaper, and more accessible cross-border transactions, such as remittances and trade, while avoiding international restrictions. Due to many Global South countries facing both internal and external trade challenges, this pushes them to switch to a currency that can avoid those challenges. The implementation of Blockchain in the Global South can improve the Global South’s position and profit as a raw material supplier within the global supply chain, rather than being limited by conventional trade systems. Blockchain’s transparency and traceability facilitate Global South in international trade especially for agriculture and natural resources (Eliason, 2022). Even with the risk of being hacked and losing digital coins, the trend of utilizing cryptocurrency is not slowing down, instead it creates other ways to store digital coins such as using cold wallets. Global south countries develop domestically controlled blockchain and support cryptocurrency legal matters to increase digital currency exposure and trust around the world. On top of that, blockchain and cryptocurrency should also support local manufacturers, SMEs, cross-border trade, and remittances among Global South citizens (Eliason, 2022).

Since the United States withdrew from the JCPOA nuclear deal in 2018, Iran has been re-imposed on \economic sanctions. These sanctions primarily target Iran’s oil sector and financial system. As a result, Iran’s currency exchange rate has plummeted, while inflation has sky-rocketed. In this economic state, both the Iranian government and civilians have begun seeking alternative, more stable stores of value and exchange rates. One widely used solution is cryptocurrency. There are several key reasons why crypto has become so attractive to Iran. First, cryptocurrencies are used as a hedge against inflation and currency devaluation. Many Iranians store their wealth in crypto, which is considered more stable than conventional currencies. Second, cryptocurrency allows the government and businesses to evade international sanctions, particularly from the US. Since 2019, the government has officially supported Bitcoin mining, taking advantage of cheap domestic electricity. On top of that, Iran uses crypto as a digital currency for export commodities. In August 2022, Iran began using crypto directly to pay for imports. The government is also exploring the use of gold-backed digital coins with Russia to strengthen bilateral transactions and avoid the US dollar and SWIFT. This move by Iran sparked a response from the international community. The US government expanded its list of sanctioned entities, including companies in the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and Hong Kong that help Iran sell oil and launder money through crypto. The US Treasury Department has also increased cooperation with blockchain intelligence agencies to track suspicious transactions. However, the effectiveness of this law enforcement remains limited as Iran actively seeks new ways to evade detection, including through anonymous decentralized finance protocols. Because of that, International policy needs to be more integrated to both support cryptocurrency as an alternative for international relations actors to have a new trade system that is operated under blockchain technology.

Conclusion

Cryptocurrency has caused a big shift in how countries trade internationally, especially for those facing difficulties in the current global financial system. SWIFT, which is a system that has been used a lot in international banking, is sometimes controlled by politics and can limit certain countries from accessing the global market, especially those in the Global South. Cryptocurrency offers a different way for these countries to take part in the economy. It works through blockchain technology, which doesn’t need third parties like banks. This makes transactions faster, cheaper, and more open. This is especially helpful for countries that are under sanctions or facing financial limits, like Iran. Cryptocurrency also helps more people and businesses around the world to take part in financial activities. With decentralized finance, people can connect directly with others without needing traditional banks. This is especially useful for small businesses and even governments. On top of that, blockchain’s ability to track transactions helps in areas like farming and exporting raw materials, which are important for many countries in the Global South. This makes their role in global trade stronger. Though there are risks like hacking and unclear rules, more people are using cryptocurrency, showing how important it is. In the end, cryptocurrency is a brand new technology that gives people more control over their money and challenges the conventional financial systems. It creates new paths for trade that are fairer, more open, and not controlled by political power or banks.

 

[ Vericko Dhuha Zahir Negara is a COGGS Intern and Student at International Relations
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences National Development, University “Veteran” of East Java, Surabaya, Indonesia]

 

References

  1. Marco Cipriani, Linda S. Goldberg, & Gabriele La Spada (2023). Financial Sanctions, SWIFT, and the Architecture of the International Payment System.
  2. Slatvinska Valeria, Demchenko Vitaliia, Tretiak Kateryna, Hnatyuk Rostyslav, & Yarema Oleg (2022). The Impact of Blockchain Technology on International Trade and Financial Business. DOI:10.13189/ujaf.2022.100111
  3. Patrick Schueffel (2021). DeFi: Decentralized Finance- An Introduction and Overview
  4. Dirk A. Zetzsche, DouglasW.Arner, & Ross P. Buckley (2020). Decentralized Finance
  5. Immanuel Wallerstein (2004). World-System Analysis An Introduction.
  6. Rose Mahdavieh (2022). State Adoption of Cryptocurrency: a Case Study Analysis of Iran, Russia, and Venezuela.
  1. Moritz Böhmecke-Schwafert & Eduardo García Moreno (2023). Exploring Blockchain-based Innovations for Economic and Sustainable Development in the GlobalSouth: A Mixed-Method Approach based on Web Mining and Topic Modeling.
  1. Antonia Eliason (2022). BLOCKCHAIN, TRADE, AND THE GLOBAL SOUTH:

ENTRENCHING SUPPLY CHAIN ROLES.

  1. Reuter (2025). S. issues additional Iran-related sanctions, Treasury website shows.
  2. Arab News (2022). How Iran is cashing in on cryptocurrencies to evade US sanctions.

 

Cryptocurrency in Global South Trade: The Iran Case Study Analysis | COGGS Intern | Read Now| Read Post »

India and GCC Deepen Economic and Strategic Ties

|

India and GCC Deepen Economic and Strategic Ties

Balaji Chandramohan

As India expands its politico-economic reach in the international system, especially in Asia’s geopolitics – it is looking for economic partners in the Gulf region as part of its aspirations. This will be welcomed by the countries in the region collectively, as they tend to recognize New Delhi’s credentials as a responsible power in the comity of nations. Institutionally, cooperation will be strengthened between India and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which will have vital significance for India. The GCC is a union of six countries in the Gulf region — Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, and Bahrain. The council is the largest trading bloc for India.

 

Experts note that the Gulf region’s substantial oil and gas reserves are of immense importance for India’s energy security and its growing population’s demands. India’s economic ties with the GCC have been steadily increasing, especially due to the growth in oil imports.

On the other hand, India’s exports to the GCC have shown steady growth in recent times. India exports a wide range of products to the region, including food processing, jewellery, synthetic fibers, textiles, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods, all offering substantial potential.

Further, in an effort to improve their trade relations, India and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have agreed to pursue a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the two regions. Negotiations are set to increase in the upcoming months.

Meanwhile, India has started important geo-economic outreach to the Gulf region, which includes facilitating financial connectivity, such as integrating India’s UPI system with the UAE’s JAYWAN card. The RuPay card is also being considered.

Investment opportunities from Sovereign Wealth Funds in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait are being closely observed from New Delhi. It is also a fact that the Gulf region forms an important cog in the world’s geo-economics, as it connects Europe to the markets in Asia and to the wider Indo-Pacific region.

Additionally, the GCC countries collectively host a large Indian expatriate community, facilitating cooperation in terms of trade and investment. Through collaborative initiatives in trade, investment, infrastructure development, open exchange of information, and people-to-people ties, this partnership not only bolsters economic growth within the region and India, but also contributes to a more stable and prosperous global economy.

India and the GCC also share a desire for political stability and security in the region, which may help India expand its outreach to other regions globally in terms of the economy. India recognizes that the Gulf region is one of the most volatile in Asia, where special focus is required if it is to strengthen its credentials as a stable economic partner.

 

 

Institutional exchanges between India and GCC countries began with the first-ever India-GCC Political Dialogue, held on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly on September 26, 2003. Both sides recognized the significance of this dialogue, which marked a new era in India-GCC relations at the start of this century.

Subsequently, India and the GCC signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the Mechanisms of Consultations on September 10, 2022, during Indian Foreign Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar’s visit to Riyadh (September 10-12, 2022) to facilitate better trade. This was followed by the first India-GCC Senior Officials Meeting, held on March 20, 2023, in Riyadh.

The dialogue also highlighted emerging opportunities in education and connectivity, especially through the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, which presents significant potential for growth by linking energy-rich markets of Europe to Asia.

In 2024, the first-ever India–GCC Joint Ministerial Meeting for Strategic Dialogue was held on September 9, 2024, in Riyadh, emphasizing the importance of combining geo-economics with strategy.

The ministerial meeting also adopted a Joint Action Plan 2024-2028 for undertaking various joint activities in diverse areas, including health, trade, security, agriculture and food security, transportation, energy, culture, and others.

India’s outreach to the GCC was further strengthened when Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar visited Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from September 8-9, 2024, to attend the first-ever India–GCC Joint Ministerial Meeting for Strategic Dialogue, which had important economic implications. This marked the inaugural meeting between India and the GCC at the Foreign Ministers level, attended by the Foreign Ministers of all GCC countries and Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, Secretary General of the GCC.

Dr. Jaishankar’s participation in the multilateral dialogue underscored a significant qualitative leap in bilateral and multilateral relations between India and the Arab Gulf states. The India–GCC Joint Ministerial meeting emphasized the growing economic partnership between India and the GCC, focusing on collaboration in economic trade, foreign investment, infrastructure development, and people-to-people ties.

The meeting envisaged the Joint Action Plan for 2024-2028, outlining various joint activities in sectors such as health, trade, security, agriculture, food security, transportation, energy, and culture. The scope of cooperation may expand further, subject to mutual consensus.

The Indian Foreign Minister also used the opportunity to hold several bilateral meetings with the Foreign Ministers of GCC countries. Jaishankar pointed out that the GCC is a “cornerstone of global energy supply” and called for deepening collaboration, which he said would help “stabilize markets, drive innovation, and enhance energy security.”

Following the Indian External Affairs Minister’s visit, the UAE reinforced its economic priorities with India, as Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, visited India from September 9-10, 2024, at the invitation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

During his visit, he met with President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Besides the political significance, the visit included participation in a business forum in Mumbai, strengthening economic ties between India and the UAE. Four significant agreements were signed between Indian and UAE entities in the energy sector.

As part of the state visit, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the operations and maintenance of the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant between Emirates Nuclear Energy Company (ENEC) and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) was proposed.

In addition to multilateral cooperation, bilateral relations between India and the UAE have seen a notable upswing in recent years, with approximately 3.5 million Indians forming the largest expatriate group in the UAE. The two countries are among each other’s top trading partners, with bilateral trade reaching USD 85 billion in the 2022-23 financial year. India’s relations with the Arab Gulf countries are a vital pillar of its foreign policy, given the shared interests between the two sides, the presence of about 9 million Indian workers in the Gulf, and significant trade exchange. Security and strategic relations, as well as energy provision, remain crucial areas of collaboration.

As both India and the Gulf States look towards the future, there is growing anticipation of further deepening ties to advance economic cooperation, regional stability, and international security.

In conclusion, as India aspires to a better position as a global economic powerhouse, it will naturally look to the Gulf countries as part of its economic aspirations. In that context, as the GCC countries also recognize India’s emergence as one of the fastest-growing economies and a market for their exports, they will increasingly gravitate towards New Delhi. Therefore, India–GCC economic cooperation will translate into substantial geo-economic cooperation, which may strengthen existing political relations in the years to come. 

[ The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the views of COGGS. ] 

India and GCC Deepen Economic and Strategic Ties Read Post »

Why BRICS, Global South need Angola?

|

[ The piece is syndicated from The Week, followed by Angolan President João Lourenço’s maiden visit to India. The title of the article differs from the article published in the Indian magazine. Author is a fellow and content editor at COGGS. ]

Ayanangsha Maitra

POWER MAY ONCE have been spilled from the barrel of a gun, but Angola is showing the energy-starved Global South that today, it flows from the barrel of crude oil. As Angolan President João Lourenço visited India on his maiden trip to India earlier this month (May 2-4), two nations from opposite ends of the world found themselves co-architects of a new multipolar order.

President Lourenço—a former freedom fighter who took up arms to liberate the motherland from Portuguese colonial rule—reached New Delhi at a time when both countries are pushing to reform global institutions and rebalance power dynamics. His visit is more than ceremonial; it signalled the elevation of India-Angola ties into a deep partnership grounded in energy, defence, technology, and developmental aspirations.


India is already one of Angola’s largest buyers of oil and gas. Now, the relationship is expanding far beyond hydrocarbons. Following bilateral talks, both countries committed to deep cooperation in digital public infrastructure, space technology, defence, diamond processing, healthcare, and critical minerals. India has offered a $200 million defence credit line to modernise Angola’s armed forces and will help train its military personnel.

Sitting on the southwestern coast of Africa,  Angola is working to reduce its economic dependence on oil by attracting investments from China, the UAE, and Portugal, particularly in infrastructure, ports, railways, and energy. India, too, sees an opportunity: the potential introduction of Indian diesel locomotives and the expansion of Angola’s railways—especially into mineral-rich regions—could be transformative. As India’s Economic Envoy Dammu Ravi noted, “There is a possibility to introduce Indian diesel locomotives and also expand the railway network interior, north-south and east-west and leading into the areas of their minerals, which are very important for them in terms of logistics.”
 
Despite $4.2 billion in bilateral trade, Angola enjoys a major surplus. India imports around $3.5 billion—mostly oil—while exporting less than $700 million in goods such as medicines, meat, textiles, cotton, chemicals,  leather items, tractors, and vehicles. Angola sends iron, copper, aluminium, and other minerals in return, apart from energy. Reducing this imbalance will require India to push for better market access and explore investment-led growth in Angola.

Angola is habitat to around 8,000 people of Indian origin and has recently implemented visa-free entry for Indian citizens to promote tourism and business. The historical links are not just symbolic. Goa and Angola, once colonies under Portuguese rule, share cultural resonances. Pandurang Shirodkar, the first speaker of the Goa legislative assembly and an early supporter of Angola’s independence, was imprisoned and deported to Angola by the colonial regime—an overlooked but powerful connection.
India inspired and supported Angola’s liberation movement, and post-independence, India  backed the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA). The two are vocal at the forums like Non-Alignment Movement.

Unlike India, Angola’s real soft power doesn’t lie in cultural exports like Bollywood or the Taj Mahal. Instead, it lies in Sonangol, its oil giant. Formed in 1976, the state-owned Sonangol is now Africa’s second-largest oil producer and one of its most diversified corporations, with stakes in telecoms, shipping, engineering, and even shipbuilding. The company’s PAENAL shipyard hosts Africa’s largest heavy-lifting crane—a symbol of Angola’s industrial ambition. India is already partnering on key infrastructure projects such as the Moçâmedes Railway and sees potential for deeper collaboration in satellite technology, where ISRO could play a future role. Angola currently works with Russia and France on space applications, but India’s affordable space programme offers an attractive alternative.

Angola also holds growing geopolitical relevance. As chair of the African Union—whose entry into the G20 was strongly backed by India—Luanda is poised to shape continental strategies. Its ties within the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP) also give it leverage in Latin America, especially Brazil. The cultural and strategic alignment with lusophone nations puts Angola at the crossroads of continents and makes a link between Latin America and Africa.
 
Moreover, Angola’s recent role as a mediator in the Rwanda- DR Congo peace talks and President Lourenço’s strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack highlight its emergence as a responsible global actor. As Angola discovers new oil fields, India’s expertise in refining, transport, and energy infrastructure could play a vital role in translating resources into growth.
 
Angola’s participation in the India-led Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure, Big Cat Alliance and Global Biofuels Alliance would be a transformative episode. Yet the challenge remains: to ensure this relationship doesn’t plateau at trade. Without active investment, deeper cultural exchange, and expanded cooperation, passive trade imbalances could undercut long-term goodwill. This is the moment to build a robust, reciprocal trade partnership—one that connects Luanda and New Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Mysore, Calcutta and Goa not just through products, but through values, and opportunity. Angola’s position within BRICS—attending summits and maintaining separate ties with each of the BRICS nations—further cements its strategic weight. If BRICS expands further in Africa, Angola could become a cornerstone in fulfilling the energy and development needs of the Global South. Private companies from Russia and India should exercise a greater role to make the nation glitter, by penetrating into areas like agri-tech.

However, to address the persistent trade imbalance, India must seek greater market access in Angola and across the region. A passive trade dynamic risks undermining the healthy and warm relationships between the two aspiring global south powers.

 

 

Why BRICS, Global South need Angola? Read Post »

President Trump in Saudi, UAE, Qatar: What Gulf States Want from the US?

|

Ayanangsha Maitra

The US PRESIDENT, Donald Trump, will emplane for a three-nation state visit, with Saudi Arabia as the first stop on May 13 (Tuesday). The Republican President will then go to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, two of the non-NATO yet prime security partners of the US. During his visit, which runs through May 16, various announcements, negotiations, and strategic decisions are expected. Whether Persian Gulf to be called by the same name – his visit will bring clarity.

Although the visit comes amid ongoing regional crises  in Gaza and Iran, but the agendas will be on economic deals rather than immediate diplomatic breakthroughs.  During President Trump’s Middle East visit, talks on Gaza, Ukraine, and Iran will be tabled. Meanwhile, Muscat has successfully concluded 4th round of informal talks between Tehran and Washington. The US could raise Oman Talks issue here too. During the middle-east visit, Trump’s agenda features major announcements in trade, oil, defense, nuclear energy, and technology, as Gulf leaders actively compete to secure American favour and future cooperation by offering substantial deals and investment commitments. In March, Trump said he would visit Saudi Arabia if it invests $1 trillion in the US. Saudi Arabia did not confirm this amount. But in January, the Kingdom said it would increase trade and investment with the US by $600 billion over four years. There could be more investment in coming years.

 

Gulf States want the US to confirm its security support for the region. Last year, the US and Saudi Arabia nearly finished a major defense and trade agreement. The talks stopped because Saudi Arabia wanted Israel to agree to a plan for Palestinian statehood. The Kingdom of Saudi wants US help to build a civil nuclear program. The talks are delayed because Saudi Arabia wants to enrich uranium in its own country. The US and Israel worry this could lead to nuclear weapons. Uranium can be used for weapons if enriched to high levels.

Saudi Arabia wants to depend less on oil. It still needs to sell oil at good prices to pay for this change. Price drops, US tariffs, and threats could make this harder. Trump wants oil prices to stay high. Saudi Arabia also wants high oil prices to help its economy grow.

 

 

Detailed close-up image of a map focusing on Middle East and North Africa.

Each Gulf nation is leveraging its financial power and personal ties with Trump to pledge multibillion-dollar investments in the U.S. economy, purchase American-made weaponry, and expand partnerships in advanced sectors, all aimed at strengthening their strategic alliance with Washington and maximizing their own national interests.

 

A stable Middle East is the need of the West as well as global south – not just the middle east. It helps lower migration, keeps energy markets steady, and limits the spread of extremist ideas. President Trump will be accompanied  by a  business delegation who will seize investment opportunities across sectors.

 

Education has been a key part of Saudi-US ties. The King Abdullah Scholarship Program has sent thousands of Saudi students to study in the United States. American students have also studied in Saudi Arabia through programs like the Fulbright exchange and partnerships with US universities. The US remains important for Saudi Arabia, especially in areas like energy transition, clean technology, and digital transformation.

 

Since 1974, six US presidents have visited Saudi Arabia. These visits show Saudi Arabia’s lasting role as a stabilizing force in a region often facing conflict. Presidential visits to Saudi Arabia are a tradition that began after the country was unified by King Abdulaziz Al-Saud in 1932. In 1945, President Franklin D. Roosevelt met King Abdulaziz after World War II, marking the start of close ties.

 

In 1957, King Saud became the first Saudi king to visit the US, meeting President Eisenhower. This visit focused on finding long-term solutions for the region and led to efforts to strengthen the Saudi military. King Faisal visited President Johnson in 1966 and President Nixon in 1971. In 1974, the US and Saudi Arabia created a joint economic commission to work together on industry, education, technology, and farming. In the same year, President Nixon reciprocated the visit to Saudi Arabia, forming the growing ties.

 

In 1982, Vice President George H. W. Bush visited Riyadh to offer condolences after King Khalid’s death, highlighting the personal side of the relationship. In 2002, the two countries started the Saudi-US Strategic Dialogue during King Abdullah’s visit to President George W. Bush in Texas, focusing on cooperation in counterterrorism, energy, education, and the economy. In 2012, the GCC-US Strategic Forum began, with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attending the first meeting in Riyadh, raising the Gulf Cooperation Council’s role in US regional plans. In 2017, President Trump visited Riyadh, holding three major summits: the Arab Islamic American Summit, the US-Saudi Bilateral Summit, and the US-GCC Cooperation Council Summit.

UAE

The main objectives of President Donald Trump’s visit to the United Arab Emirates , in the second leg of middle east tour, is to secure major economic agreements and investments that align with his “America First” or Make America Great Again agenda. Trump aims to attract substantial new investments from the UAE and other Gulf states into the U.S. economy, particularly from sovereign wealth funds, to showcase job creation and bolster domestic manufacturing ahead of the 2026 election cycle. On the other hand, AI is one of the main trending issue between the two. The US and the United Arab Emirates are deepening their cooperation in artificial intelligence through major joint investments, technology partnerships, and government agreements-highlighted by multi-billion-dollar deals between Emirati firms like MGX and G42 and U.S. companies such as Microsoft, as well as ongoing efforts to develop shared principles and a government-to-government memorandum of understanding to ensure AI is used safely, securely, and for mutual economic growth.

 

Explore the dynamic cityscape of Abu Dhabi featuring a modern bridge and skyline over tranquil waters.

 

 

 

In March, the UAE announced a $1.4 trillion investment plan over ten years. This money will go to oil, semiconductors, manufacturing, and energy. US investments already add up to $1 trillion, according to US officials.

Economic and Investment Deals: The UAE is expected to announce significant investment commitments, with reports suggesting pledges totaling up to $1.4 trillion over the next decade, focusing on sectors such as energy, technology, and defense.

Defense and Technology Agreements: The UAE, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, is likely to commit to major purchases of American defense systems and technology, supporting both U.S. industry and regional security.

Energy Cooperation: Discussions may include increasing oil supplies and potential relaxation of U.S. export controls on energy and technology, as well as nuclear energy cooperation.

Geopolitical Alignment: Trump is expected to press the UAE to align more closely with U.S. interests in its strategic competition with China and to support U.S. positions on regional conflicts, including those involving Iran and the Israel-Gaza situation.

The visit will be highly ceremonial, with the UAE aiming to demonstrate its importance as a U.S. partner and to maximize its own leverage in bilateral relations. The UAE, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, views Trump’s return to office as a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” to secure long-term economic and security advantages amid a prolonged trade war between US and China.

Qatar

Trump’s state visit to Qatar is seen as a “crescendo” in U.S.-Qatari relations, with both nations eager to showcase their partnership and announce new agreements across defense, trade, education, health, and technology. The Al Thanis have gifted President Trump a luxury Boeing 747-8 jet for temporary use as Air Force One -which is yet to be considered for acceptance.

Qatar’s diplomatic role in the region, its close ties with Syria’s leadership, and its emergence as a multinational business hub all position Doha as a critical player in Trump’s Middle East strategy. Needless to say, it’s Doha that played the most constructive role in the negotiation between the US and Taliban. Security is on the focus too. Qatar’s Al Udeid Air Base is the largest U.S. military installation in the Middle East.

A detailed close-up of the Qatar national flag showcasing its unique design and colors.

 

President Trump’s whirlwind three-nation middle east tour spotlights fierce regional competition for the US favour, with Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar leveraging mega-investments and defense deals to secure their strategic interests. As economic ambitions and security pledges dominate the agenda, Trump’s visit is bound to reshape alliances and recalibrate the balance of power in the Middle East region.

 

President Trump in Saudi, UAE, Qatar: What Gulf States Want from the US? Read Post »

Tariff Crisis a Wake-up call for Global South – Unite or Perish | Mohammed Saqib |

|
  • Mohammed Saqib

THE US PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s recent sweeping tariff agenda represents perhaps the most aggressive trade policy initiative in modern history. It is another sign of U.S. arrogance and unilateralism that has sent shockwaves across global markets. The staggering tariffs on U.S. imports threaten a trade disruption, destabilizing the global economy. These measures will likely damage supply chains, cause inflation, lead to global market volatility, and disproportionately harm the Global South members.

The current tariff crisis is a wake-up call — unite or perish. It presents itself as not only a challenge, but also an opportunity for a unified Global South response, one that amplifies the voice and influence of developing nations in shaping international economic governance.

 

China faces punitive tariffs of up to a bizarre 245 percent, while India, though in a comparatively low position at 26 percent (currently on a 90-day hold), is in a precarious state between strategic autonomy and economic pragmatism.

The United States may label India “tariff king” for its trade practices, but it hypocritically imposes tariff burdens on nearly all its trade partners, regardless of their development status. This approach seems to be a strategy to reestablish unilateral U.S. dominance in global trade governance, in the guise of efforts to address trade deficits or protect American jobs.

The announced tariff on global imports shifts from targeted pressure to aggressive economic nationalism. Countries in the Global South, intricately linked to Chinese manufacturing networks, are bracing for a significant fallout.

Amid this economic chaos, the White House is using intimidation tactics. Policies are announced, held and withdrawn by the hour. Some nations are being tempted by offers of preferential market access from the United States in exchange for reducing their economic ties with China. However, countries should look at historical examples that strongly advise against falling into the trap of opportunism.

Negotiating individual deals with the United States may falsely suggest secure national interests but actually weaken collective bargaining power. Bilateral agreements offer neither security nor sustainability in a system that allows unilateral changes to rules. Global South members must understand that such deals can undermine their collective negotiating strength.

India and China, the fastest-growing large economies with a combined GDP of more than 22 trillion U.S. dollars and nearly 35 percent of the global manufacturing capacity, possess significant economic leverage. Their collaboration can potentially create substantial benefits for both themselves and the broader developing world.

By working together, the two countries can establish vital market access reciprocity, develop an alternative financial framework, harmonize technical standards and coordinate resources effectively for the Global South. This constructive partnership can pave the way for more equitable global economic governance. Moreover, accelerating de-dollarization and strengthening frameworks like the BRICS and New Development Bank could enhance their financial autonomy.

While India-China coordination is essential for an effective response, the broader Global South must be engaged. The Bandung Conference in 1955 and the WTO Bali Ministerial Conference in 2013 demonstrated the potential for South-South cooperation.

Developing nations can counter U.S. economic coercion and amplify their influence in international economic governance with solidarity, and India-China coordination is crucial. When these giants speak as one, the world will indeed listen.

 [ Mohammed Saqib is an Economist and  Convenor of COGGS. The article is syndicated from Xinhua News Agency. ] 

Tariff Crisis a Wake-up call for Global South – Unite or Perish | Mohammed Saqib | Read Post »

Scroll to Top